Class |
Topic and/or Activity |
Suggested Readings |
1. March 4 |
Introduction
Review of syllabus, state of the art, organisation of the course
|
No Reading |
|
Sect. 1 Data and borders
|
|
2. March 5 |
Towards extraterritorial jurisdiction? |
D.J. Svantesson, Extraterritoriality in the context of data privacy regulation, 7 Masaryk U. J. L. Tech. 87 (2012)
fArt. 3 GDPR
ECJ, Google Spain case (C-131/12) |
3. March 11 |
The challenges of transnational mass surveillance |
F. Bignami - G. Resta, Transatlantic Privacy Regulation : Conflict and Cooperation, 78 Law & Cont. Prob’s 231 (2015)
ECJ, Schrems case (C-362/14) |
4. March 12 |
Regulating data-flow in the digital sphere |
S. Livingston – G. Greenleaf, China’s New Data Export Rules: Adequacy with Chinese Characteristics? 147 Privacy Laws & Business International Report 9 (2017)
Arts. 44-49 GDPR |
|
Sect. 2 Data ownership
|
|
5. March 18 |
Who owns data in a world of big data? |
J. Drexl, Designing Competitive Markets for Industrial Data. Between Propertisation and Access, 8 JIPITEC 257 (2017) |
6. March 19 |
Personal data : property or privacy? |
Proposal for a Directive on the Supply of Digital Content COM/2015/0634: art. 3
GDPR : art. 7
A. Metzger, Data as Counter-Performance, 8 JIPITEC 2 (2017) |
7. March 25 |
The idea of digital commons |
T. Dreier, Germany: Creating New Property Rights on the Basis of General Legal Concepts: Without Limits?, 2 JIPITEC 152 (2011)
ECJ, Renckhoff case (C‑161/17) |
|
Sect. 3 Algorithms
|
|
8. March 26 |
Decision making by algorithms: the black box society
|
Courtland, The Bias Detectives, in Nature (2018)
J. Angwin – J. Larson – S. Mattu – L. Kirchner, Machine Bias, ProPublica, 23-5-2016
State v. Loomis, 881 N.W.2d 749 (2016)
Houston Fed. Teachers v. Houston Independent, 251 F.Supp.3d 1168 (2017)
|
9. April 1 |
Regulating algorithms and Artificial Intelligence: the challenges for the law |
L. Edwards – M. Veale, Enslaving the Algorithm: From a ‘Right to an Explanation’ to a ‘Right to Better Decisions’?, IEEE Security & Privacy (2018) 16(3), 46–54
Art. 22 GDPR |
10. April 2 |
Algorithmic Surveillance |
Y.J. Chen et al., ‘Rule of Trust’: The Power and Perils of China’s Social Credit Megaproject, 32 Columbia J. Asian L. 1 (2018)
M.Hu, Algorithmic Jim Crow, 86 Fordham L. Rev. 633 (2017) (excerpts) |
|
Sect. 4 Digital Technologies and Fundamental Rights
|
|
11. April 8 |
Anonimity and digital communications |
S. Gunther, Facebook’s Real Name Policy : A Violation of the Corporate’s Responsibility to Respect Human Rights, https://www.business-humanrights.org/
ECHR Delfi v. Estonia
|
12. April 9 |
Digital Inheritance : data and digital content after death |
Yahoo v Ajemian 84 N.E.3d 766 (Mass. 2017)
G. Resta, Personal Data and Digital Assets after Death, EuCML 201 (2018) |
13. April 15 |
Personalized medicine, big data and biobanks |
Washington University v. Catalona, 437 F. Supp. 2d 985 (2006)
C. Piciocchi et al., Legal issues in governing genetic biobanks, J. Community Genet. (2018) 9:177–190 |
14. April 16 |
3d Printing |
European Commission, The disruptive nature of 3d Printing
European Parliament, Report on three-dimensional printing, a challenge in the fields of intellectual property rights and civil liability |
|
Sect. 5 Digital Platforms
|
|
15. April 29 |
The law and economics of digital platforms |
O. Lobel, The Law of the Platform, 101 Minn. L. Rev. 87, 166 (2016)
ECJ, Uber case (C-434/15) |